Chapter 1 Scope of the Study

1.1  Study Areas and Countries

The countries designated for the study and the study periods are as follows (refer to Figure 1):

-  Cote d'Ivoire (1992-1994)
-  Tanzania and Zambia (1995-1997)
-  Malawi (1998-2000)

            Figure 1  Location Map of the Studied Countries


As for Tanzania, however, a two-year aftercare and monitoring period was set aside after the completion of the study, as suggested by the study team's assessment that follow-up would be especially needed there after the field trials ended.

In selecting the countries for the study, rice production volumes, trends of demand for rice, environments for paddy rice cultivation, presence of inland valley bottoms, government policies on rice production, and projects implemented by international research institutes and JICA were examined based on data and information available in Japan.  The study areas were preliminary selected from candidate locations based on data and information available in Japan.  Preliminary selected were areas where there were valley bottoms and the farmers practice agriculture including rice farming, in accordance with the study objectives.  The study areas were then determined through on-site surveys and discussions with the counterpart government agencies of the respective countries, aid organizations, JICA local offices, and Japanese experts during the first fieldwork.

1.2  Course and Activities of the Study

The study was carried out over a three-year period for each country and through collections and analyses of relevant materials in Japan, domestic investigative works and overseas fieldworks.  In Japan, a steering committee consisting of academic experts and authorities on the relevant fields was formed to examine the way the study was conducted and the contents of the reports.

The course and activities of the study of each year are outlined as follows.

(1) Year 1: Selection of the study areas and study on the existing conditions

Selecting the countries for the study; selecting model areas (i.e., study areas) for the project planning; studying the areas' existing conditions of socio-economy, agriculture, land use, water utilizations, farmers' living, farming practices, agricultural extension system and training, etc.; identifying the areas' developmental potentials and constraints; and formulating developmental strategy.

(2) Year 2: Formulation of development plans (tentative) and implementation of field trials

Formulating project implementation plans (tentative) including preparation of agricultural infrastructure, crop production (e.g., paddy rice), agricultural extension and training, development of appropriate technologies, etc.; and implementing field trials to collect data and examine the validity of the tentative plans.

(3) Year 3: Finalization of the development plan, assessment of the project planning, and suggestions on project implementation and management system

Continuing the field trials; compiling the study results; finalizing the project implementation plan; assessing the project planning; and offering suggestions on project implementation and management system.

1.3  Study Method

The fieldworks were carried out assuming the local people's participation, but the decision on the method of participatory study was made by the study team.  The present study also has the following features.

(1) Long study period but small number of experts committed

Though a three-year study period was allotted to each country, fieldworks were held twice a year, each of which lasted only about two weeks and to which only five team-members at the maximum were dispatched.  The number of experts committed was 15 person-months at the maximum each year including domestic works, and about 40 person-months for the entire study period (3 years).  As this indicates, the span of the study period was long relative to the number of specialists committed.  Further, they visited each village four to five times, and because the their fieldwork stay was short each time, (1) their contact with the local people happened frequently and over a long time span, making it easier to develop trust with them; (2) it was possible to adjust the course of planning through field trials and discussions; and (3) the extent of the participation by the local people and the counterpart organizations of the respective countries came to determine the study's success greatly.

(2) Implementation of field trials

Field trials with the subjects extracted from project ideas were implemented to assess the validity (or feasibility) of the tentative project plans to be formulated at the beginning of the second year.  The contents of the field trials were determined by the study team through discussions with the counterpart organizations of the respective countries and the local people.  They included fertilizer application experiments for crops, construction of small-scale irrigation facilities, groundwater development (including geo-physical surveys), farmers' organizing and training, and prevention measures against damage by wild animals.  The scale of the field trials was about US$15,000 (2 million yen) at the maximum.

 

<< Preface         Chapter 2 >>